nanog mailing list archives

Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics


From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 05:47:24 -0700

In a message written on Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 04:16:45PM -0400, Sharon Goldberg wrote:
An ISP might deploy S*BGP in order to increase the volume of traffic
that it transits for its customers.

I think this phrase summarizes the problem with this argument nicely.

If, as an ISP, deploying a "secure" routing protocol changes my
traffic positively or negatively something is wrong.  Securing the
routing system should not alter the routing system.

I'm afraid as long as it does this work has an uphill battle.

-- 
       Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
        PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: