Re: NAT444 or ?

["Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>]

On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:

> I'd agree that, usually, distributed is better but these are not distributed networks, there is a single point (or a 
> few large single points) of contact.

The point is that these aggregations of state are quite vulnerable, and therefore they should be as distributed as is 
practicable.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

                The basis of optimism is sheer terror.

                          -- Oscar Wilde