Re: NAT444 or ?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:13:26 EDT, Dorn Hetzel said:

> Perhaps it can be made ever so slightly less ugly if endpoints get an
> "address" that consists of a 32 bit IP address + (n) upper bits of port
> number.
>
> This might be 4 significant bits to share an IP 16 ways, or 8 significant
> bits to share it 256 ways, or whatever.

And you store the 4 or 8 bits in what part of the IPv4 header, exactly?

Attachment: _bin
Description: