Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

[jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>]

I think a co-pay would be be reasonable.    If I human manually did a
refund I'm sure the process could ne 'fixed'.  It would be interesting
to know how many people, based on paste events this would impact.  I
agree in that I as well suspect its a very low number.

-jim

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
> Two comments here:
>
> In the past a human would review and refund speakers if they paid.
>
> A nominal co-pay may be appropriate, even if it's just $10. Students qualify for lower rates last I recall as well. 
> We are talking about a small number of people here, at most 1-2 per conference I suspect based on historical chats.
>
> Jared Mauch
>
> On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:27 AM, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com> wrote:
>
> > If a
> > members company is willing to pay anyway, then people always have the
> > option of not accepting the free entrance.  As for people 'hardship'
> > cases, how ever you want to define it, there is no revenue loss here
> > as they would be unlikely so spend $ to attend anyway if they had to
> > pay.