nanog mailing list archives
Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:07:10 -0400
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:39:57 -0400, Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com> wrote:
Couldn't you also advertise the /48 from all the sites, if you're willing to sort things out over the inter-site VPNs?
If we're talking about a site-to-site IPsec VPN "over the internet", then that's a very bad idea. Even if "the internet" in this case is entirely within the same provider's network. (and it doesn't sound like it is.)
--Ricky
Current thread:
- using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Dmitry Cherkasov (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Richard Barnes (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Ricky Beam (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Richard Barnes (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Jeroen Massar (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Steven Bellovin (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Randy Carpenter (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Owen DeLong (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Justin M. Streiner (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Justin M. Streiner (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 31)