nanog mailing list archives
Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:37:20 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 parts across locations or should we obtain separate /48 for each of them? Or maybe we need /32 that can be split into multiple /48? Anyway we are not ISP so /48 looks quite reasonable and sufficient for all our needs.
Don't expect anyone to accept less than /48, so in your setup you need a /48 per site.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Dmitry Cherkasov (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Richard Barnes (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Ricky Beam (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Richard Barnes (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Jeroen Massar (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Steven Bellovin (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Randy Carpenter (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Owen DeLong (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Justin M. Streiner (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Joel jaeggli (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Justin M. Streiner (Oct 31)
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 31)