nanog mailing list archives

Re: Outsourcing DDOS


From: Dennis <dennis () justipit com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:24:20 -0400

Good points Steven.  I'd suggest a deep dive on the technologies implemented by the vendor today as times and attack 
methods have evolved. Many attacks today are not Volumetric or easily detected or mitigated by traditional methods.

Stefan Fouant <sfouant () shortestpathfirst net> wrote:

Although a bit dated, I did a pretty exhaustive comparison of offerings 
from AT&T, Verizon, Prolexic, and a few others a while back.

Don't forget there is also the go-it-yourself approach which is always a 
fun option, guaranteed to keep you up at night and give you a few 
additional gray hairs...

Let me know if you're interested in the slides...

Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks

Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate

On 10/20/2011 4:43 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At 09:13 19/10/2011 -0400, samuel.cunningham () wellsfargo com wrote:
We are considering using Prolexic to 'defend' our Internet-facing
network from DDOS attacks. Anyone have any known issues or word of
warnings before we proceed?

Things to check:

- DDOS service caps
- outage remedy credits
- service trial period
- monitoring - you will want some external mutually agreeable monitoring
service like gomez/compuware. Who pays for it?

Regards,
Hank



Chris Cunningham
Network Engineering
Secure Connectivity
704-427-3557 (Desk)
704-701-6924 (Cell)
Samuel.Cunningham () Wellsfargo com<mailto:Samuel.cunningham () wellsfargo com>
[X]

This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential
and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.





Current thread: