nanog mailing list archives

RE: meeting network


From: "Menerick, John" <jmenerick () netsuite com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:13:49 -0700


"....Also note - the conference or hotel's IT people will always claim they
have "done this before with no problems" even when they haven't....."

Sounds like a true sales person :)


- John Menerick

________________________________________
From: JC Dill [jcdill.lists () gmail com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 11:36 AM
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: meeting network

On 10/10/11 7:00 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It would be wise for NANOG to approach future venues and specifically discuss these things with the hotel IT 
departments in question ahead of time so that they have some remote chance of being prepared.

I tried this approach many years ago, for a Blogher conference.  The
hotel's IT people were uncooperative, and incompetent, and they lied
both about their network design and their equipment capabilities.  I
have since learned that this is par for the course.  IMHO the only way
to solve this problem is with big $$$ penalties in the contract, big
enough that the incompetent IT people realize their jobs are on the line
and relinquish control so experts can get access and set-up things properly.

Also note - the conference or hotel's IT people will always claim they
have "done this before with no problems" even when they haven't.

jc




NOTICE: This email and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information of NetSuite Inc. and is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient for the stated purpose.  Any improper use or distribution is prohibited.  If you 
are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender; do not review, copy or distribute; and promptly delete or 
destroy all transmitted information.  Please note that all communications and information transmitted through this 
email system may be monitored by NetSuite or its agents and that all incoming email is automatically scanned by a third 
party spam and filtering service.

Current thread: