nanog mailing list archives
Re: meeting network
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:10:07 -0400
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:44:12 EDT, Randy Bush said:
o no hotel believe that we'll actually be significantly high use. they simply can not conceive of it. ietf, apricot, ... have seen this time and time again
To be fair, that's not a hotel-only problem. We've seen that problem within the IT industry. Actual discussion with a vendor who wanted to analyze our logs so they could size a solution: "Send us a day's worth of logs" "OK" ... "We said a *day's* worth, not a *week*". "That *was* a day" "Wow, that logfile was huge, we didn't think anybody actually did that much traffic a day..." The sad part was that the vendor in question *really* should have known better, we're pretty sure they targeted their solution at many sites bigger than us. Or maybe the other sites are bigger, but we pound the bejeebers out of stuff. I dunno.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: meeting network, (continued)
- Re: meeting network Dobbins, Roland (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Michael Sinatra (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Dobbins, Roland (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Nick Hilliard (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network George, Wes (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network Frank Bulk (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Jared Mauch (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Christopher Morrow (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Randy Carpenter (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Owen DeLong (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Richard Barnes (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network Matt Ryanczak (Oct 10)
- Re: meeting network JC Dill (Oct 10)
- RE: meeting network Menerick, John (Oct 10)