Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in DOCSIS networks?

[Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Jeff Wheeler <jsw () inconcepts biz> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu> wrote:
> Owen has suggested "stateful firewall" as a solution to me in the
> past.  There is not currently any firewall with the necessary features
> to do this.  We sometimes knee-jerk and think "stateful firewall has
> gobs of memory and can spend more CPU time on each packet, so it is a
> more likely solution."  In this case that does not matter.  You can't
> have 2^64 bits of memory.

In principle, a firewall doesn't need  2^64 bits of memory.
You can have a single tree node that tells you  "OK,  all the
interface IDs in the range 0x0000000000000000 through
0x000000000007ffff
on   Interface/network X are in state X;    there comes a point where
you can discard stale data long before it gets close to 2^64 bits.

That's all well and good that in theory you could construct a stateful
firewall to protect some  /126  inter-router links, but seriously..

Why should you?
Stateful firewalls are not free;  neither is making a stateful
firewall that can do that.

What's the overwhelming benefit of forcing in a  /126  on your P-t-P
inter-router links if it has risks and complicates matters so much?

--
-JH