nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:59:21 -0800
On Nov 21, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:27:55PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:Unfortunately, there are some ISPs that believe this is the right thing to do. Some go so far as to claim that scrambling customer prefixes is a mechanism to help insure customer privacy.s/ISPs/governments, privacy people and influential media outlets/ There is significant political pressure (at least over here) to continue that IPv4 habit for IPv6 as well.
Yes, IMHO, Germany has some of the most misguided privacy laws and habits in human history. In the rest of the world, it is primarily ISPs that are repeating this mantra, but, hopefully reality will eventually set in and correct the situation even in Germany. Owen
Current thread:
- Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nick Hilliard (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Joel jaeggli (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Mohacsi Janos (Nov 25)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)