nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation
From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:47:45 +0100
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:27:55PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
Unfortunately, there are some ISPs that believe this is the right thing to do. Some go so far as to claim that scrambling customer prefixes is a mechanism to help insure customer privacy.
s/ISPs/governments, privacy people and influential media outlets/ There is significant political pressure (at least over here) to continue that IPv4 habit for IPv6 as well. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
Current thread:
- Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nick Hilliard (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Gary Buhrmaster (Nov 21)
- RE: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Nathan Eisenberg (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Owen DeLong (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 22)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Joel jaeggli (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Seth Mos (Nov 24)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Mohacsi Janos (Nov 25)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Daniel Roesen (Nov 21)
- Re: Dynamic (changing) IPv6 prefix delegation Bjørn Mork (Nov 21)