Re: Yahoo and IPv6

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:

> On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> > On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matthew () matthew at <mailto:matthew () matthew at>> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk to SIP phones on an IP4-only network.
> >
> > Right, that is why we have SBC / b2bue for the cases we want to work.
>
> Ok, so you concede that NAT64 requires yet another device at the edge to make the SIP phones work...
> > We have agreed to disagree on the value of this before.  Sorry your not so popular protocol is going the way of EGP 
> > .... it's just not fit for the evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I am sure you will 
> > disagree with that and insist every end user must always support ipv4 because rtmfp is top of mind for so many users 
> > .... but we can leave it at that ....please
>
> ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just be ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working 
> on the v6-only + NAT64 networks you're building, I suppose?
>
> Matthew Kaufman

Uh, BitTorrent works just fine for me on IPv6.

Owen