nanog mailing list archives
Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed
From: Brent Jones <brent () servuhome net>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 15:41:24 -0700
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Support <support () comgw co uk> wrote:
Can anyone give me their recommendation for current hardware to take 2 x full BGP feeds over 1Gb/s ports with a third Gb port for the local network? I did this about 6/7 years ago with a Cisco 7200VXR NPE300 256MB RAM but I'm guessing things have moved on??? Thanks, Chris
You could look at rolling your own box, if you budget/needs are small. Quagga/Zebra running on Linux, or a more professional/supported side you could go with Vyatta. I personally have a handful of Vyatta boxes in two sites, taking several full BGP feeds and works well. Juniper is also making small enterprise routers based on the MX80 platform, but with reduced number of interfaces. They should be out soon -- Brent Jones brent () servuhome net
Current thread:
- Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Support (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Raphael MAUNIER (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Randy Carpenter (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Bill Blackford (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Jon Lewis (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Support (May 07)
- RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed George Bonser (May 07)
- RE: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Justin M. Streiner (May 07)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Brent Jones (May 08)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed Brandon Ross (May 08)
- Re: Current recommendations for 2 x full bgp feed George Herbert (May 08)