nanog mailing list archives
RE: IPv6 SEO implecations?
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan () atlasnetworks us>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:17:28 +0000
Why is native IPv6 needed? I'd have thought a tunnel would be fine, too.
I believe the concern is that the higher latency of a tunnel would impact SEO rankings.
Current thread:
- IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? William Pitcock (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? TR Shaw (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Karl Auer (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Wil Schultz (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- RE: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nathan Eisenberg (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Nicholas Meredith (Mar 28)
- Re: IPv6 SEO implecations? Fred Baker (Mar 28)