nanog mailing list archives

213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18


From: "Gavin Pearce" <Gavin.Pearce () 3seven9 com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:47:37 -0000

Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following:
213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL)
193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET)
174.132.0.0/15 (NETBLK-THEPLANET-BLK-15)
65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0)

Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months
ago). *sigh*

Getting multiple brute force and/or spam from single IPs within those
ranges against different devices on different dates.

Gav

-----Original Message-----
From: Masato YAMANISHI [mailto:myamanis () japan-telecom com] 
Sent: 14 March 2011 16:16
To: 'Marshall Eubanks'; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables

Hi Marshall and all,

About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific 
are damaged ...

It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than 
anything I have heard or seen.

Yes, it's definetely true.

Rgs,
Masato 

-----Original Message-----
From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme () americafree tv] 
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables

In this WSJ article

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999
52421569210.html

or

http://on.wsj.com/gaPk8V 

This caught my eye :

About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific 
are damaged ...

It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than 
anything I have heard or seen.

Regards
Marshall 







Current thread: