nanog mailing list archives
Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:27:05 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 8, 2011, at 7:17 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
last allocations being seen in the remaining RIR "normal allocations" would be smaller than before plus de-aggregation of space as people "sell" or "lease" subspace of their allocations.
You have ignored the probability of disaggregation due to IP trading markets, especially given the wild-west nature of the APNIC transfer policy.
No, I haven't ignored it. I'm just more optimistic about IPv6 deployment and that there will be a lot less de-aggregation due to trading than others are.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future, (continued)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future George Herbert (Mar 09)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future David Conrad (Mar 09)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future Arturo Servin (Mar 09)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future Randy Bush (Mar 09)
- RE: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future George Herbert (Mar 08)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 08)
- Re: estimation of number of DFZ IPv4 routes at peak in the future Randy Bush (Mar 08)