nanog mailing list archives

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:18:41 -0700


On Jun 17, 2011, at 7:09 PM, David Conrad wrote:

On Jun 17, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
http://apple/ is going to break a bunch of shit.

All fully qualified domain names have a trailing dot so that you know
where the root is. At least as parsed internally by your resolver...

Sure.  And Apple's gonna make sure they put that trailing dot in their
ads and links and stuff... and their users will, without fail, remember
to type it.  :-) 

I suspect the folks who spend $185K + yearly fees will be able to afford 
engineering staff that will point out that a naked TLD is unlikely to
work for the great unwashed masses.  And if they don't, they'll get exactly
what they deserve.


That won't stop them from building zone files that look like this:


@       IN      SOA     ...
                NS              ...
                                ...
                A               ...
                AAAA    ...
www     A               ...
                AAAA    ...

Sure, they'll advertise www.apple, but, you better believe that
they'll take whatever lands at http://apple and you can certainly
count on the fact that any mal-actors that get control of one of
these TLDs (whether they paid the $185k or not) will take full
advantage of the situation and its security risks.

What I suspect you'll more likely see will be macbook.apple or 
japan.cisco or copyright-enforcement.universal.


Sure, you'll see all of that, TOO. They're not mutually exclusive.

Maybe.


Almost certainly.

Owen



Current thread: