nanog mailing list archives
Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 18 Jun 2011 01:33:28 -0000
The notion of a single-component FQDN would be quite a breakage for the basic concept of using both FQDNs and Unqualified names.
Well, you know, there's a guy whose email address has been n@ai for many years. People have varying amounts of success sending him mail. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs, (continued)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Warren Kumari (Jun 20)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Fred Baker (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jimmy Hess (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Blake Dunlap (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Chris Adams (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Richard Barnes (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Adam Atkinson (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Mark Andrews (Jun 19)