nanog mailing list archives
Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
From: Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:25:28 -0500
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com> wrote:
For me, the engineering problem remains *single-component FQDNs*. I can't itemize the code they'll break, but I'm quite certain there's a lot.
Perhaps we could get an update to the relevant RFCs.. clarifying that only NS records may be dotless in the root namespace? As in -- No hostnames A, MX, or CNAME at the TLD level. The notion of a single-component FQDN would be quite a breakage for the basic concept of using both FQDNs and Unqualified names. Consider you have a hostname on your lan called "foobar", and someone registers .foobar and lists an @ A in the foobar zone. So... does "http://foobar" go to your LAN server? If yes, then .foobar's @ record is worthless. If no, then you have a security problem.... when .foobar is suddenly registered without you knowing, and the @ A gets pointed to a 'credentials stealing' site.
Cheers, -- jra
-- -JH
Current thread:
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs, (continued)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Warren Kumari (Jun 20)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Fred Baker (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jimmy Hess (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs John Levine (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Blake Dunlap (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Randy Bush (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Chris Adams (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs David Conrad (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Richard Barnes (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Adam Atkinson (Jun 19)
- Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs Paul Vixie (Jun 19)