nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Sanitization
From: Jason LeBlanc <jml () packetpimp org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:10:51 -0500
I was fired from eBay several years ago for posting to NANOG trying to help others deal with the dDoS issues of those days, nothing said was fair for termination IMO. Using a personal account may be prudent. Now I hardly ever even post.
On 01/12/2011 03:17 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le mercredi 12 janvier 2011 à 11:41 -0800, JC Dill a écrit : <snip/>Randy, If you want to cite list policy, let's start by noting that it's a clear violation of the nanog list AUP to setup an autoresponder reply to list email[1], no matter if the autoresponder replies to the list or just to the poster. You must whitelist email from the list before applying an autoresponder. If you don't want to see the disclaimer-laden emails, then you can whitelist, then send posts with disclaimers (along with all other posts you don't care to read) to dev/null. OTOH, there is nothing in the AUP about disclaimers. Disclaimers, top posting, excessive quoting, etc. are discouraged (considered poor netiquette) but not outright forbidden.Either way, a 15-50 or more lines legal notification style appendix to a mail in an informal operation's forum... ... seems at the very best... to be of... bad taste... (to me). (Who's reading these? :)) Cheers, mh <snip/>
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco Sanitization, (continued)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization John Orthoefer (Jan 12)
- Fw: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Fw: Cisco Sanitization Scott Morris (Jan 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Lynda (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Greg Whynott (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Justin M. Streiner (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization JC Dill (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Michael Hallgren (Jan 12)
- Re: Cisco Sanitization Jason LeBlanc (Jan 14)