nanog mailing list archives

Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:28:23 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:16 PM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:43 EST, Scott Helms said:
Few home users have a stateful firewall configured

What percent of home users are running a Windows older than XP SP2?


I don't have stats per specific XP SP version, but a sampling of OSs
visiting a blog that I admin:

43.40%  WinXP
26.33%  Win7
13.00%  MacOSX
12.60%  WinVista
1.60%   unknown
1.00%   iOS
0.87%   Linux
0.87%   Android
0.13%   Win2003
0.13%   Win2000
0.07%   SymbianOS

Of course, this is just a sampling that may or may not be relevant.

- - ferg


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFNLhzuq1pz9mNUZTMRAgN0AJ4hrUq0qSfLLNMWq6RAXleb8bya2ACglxTU
tT/sP0oVu89WeWrG6XodcKU=
=+pa8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: