nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:18:17 -0500
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:21:24 PST, Paul Ferguson said:
Try this at home, with/without NAT: 1. Buy a new PC with Windows installed 2. Install all security patches needed since the OS was installed Without NAT, you're unpatched PC will get infected in less than 1 minute.
What release of Windows?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?, (continued)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Scott Helms (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jack Bates (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Lamar Owen (Jan 13)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Jeff Kell (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Paul Ferguson (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Justin Scott (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Dobbins, Roland (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Owen DeLong (Jan 12)
- Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection? Merike Kaeo (Jan 12)