Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

[Fernando Gont <fernando () gont com ar>]

On 12/01/2011 01:17 p.m., George Bonser wrote:

> But your security person needs to shift their thinking because the
> purpose of NAT and private addressing is to conserve IP address, not to
> provide security.  With IPv6, the concept of NAT goes away.  

You have heard about NAT66, right?

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando () gont com ar || fgont () acm org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1