nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:28:54 +0000
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:21 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
I hesitate to write anything off to impossibility, having witnessed the 8 to 16 to 32 to 64-bit processor progression :)
Indeed; how quickly we forget, eh? ;>
And the "depth" of infrastructure at which you can decide the traffic is bogus is much greater with IPv6.
/s/can/have the ability to
Most will end up on the target network anyway, no?
And that's the real point. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid, with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jima (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Kell (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document John Levine (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Julien Goodwin (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document TJ (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 07)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 05)