nanog mailing list archives
Re: Connectivity status for Egypt
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:06:03 -0500
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:32 PM, jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com> wrote:
iMCI or WCOM? :)
w (technically the folks that engineered it were mci folk... from texas.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson <aj () sneep net> wrote:For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET PIP).<cough> that's the MCI PIP</cough>...
Current thread:
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt, (continued)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Rob Thomas (Jan 31)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Marshall Eubanks (Jan 31)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- RE: Connectivity status for Egypt Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 31)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Alastair Johnson (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Christopher Morrow (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Christopher Morrow (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Alexander Harrowell (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt jim deleskie (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Christopher Morrow (Jan 28)
- in case of prefix withdrawal, dial-out Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Paul Ferguson (Jan 27)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Danny O'Brien (Jan 27)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Marshall Eubanks (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Patrik Wallström (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 28)
- Re: Connectivity status for Egypt Marshall Eubanks (Jan 28)