nanog mailing list archives

Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:01:40 -0800

I haven't done exhaustive testing, but, it has to do with certain combinations
of IPv4 configurations and IPv6 routing do work and other combinations
don't.

Owen

On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:

Could you elaborate?  Which circumstances?

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.

Owen

On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:




On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:

What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE

The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.

Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey

It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real 
IPv6.

Regards,
      Janos Mohacsi


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir () ripe net>
To: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed

[apologies for duplicates]

Hello,

Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:

http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011

In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about
the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like
you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on
RIPE Labs:

http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-needed

Kind Regards,
Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
RIPE NCC









Current thread: