Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed

[Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>]

Could you elaborate?  Which circumstances?

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
> It works for routing native IPv6 under some circumstances as well.
>
> Owen
>
> On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
> >
> > > What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
> > >
> > > The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6 firewall.
> >
> > Yes it is. I already reported to Marco.
> > http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/content-ipv6-cpe-survey
> >
> > It should be included somehow in a matrix But 6to4 (or other tunneling techniques) is only a substitute of real IPv6.
> >
> > Regards,
> >       Janos Mohacsi
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Mirjam Kuehne" <mir () ripe net>
> > > To: nanog () nanog org
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
> > > Subject: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
> > >
> > > [apologies for duplicates]
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Based on new information we received since the last publication, we
> > > updated the IPv6 CPE matrix:
> > >
> > > http://labs.ripe.net/Members/mirjam/ipv6-cpe-survey-updated-january-2011
> > >
> > > In order to make this information more useful for a large user base, we
> > > are preparing a detailed survey to gather more structural feedback about
> > > the range of equipment that is currently in use. Not only would we like
> > > you to participate in this survey, but we also ask for your help in
> > > identifying the right survey questions. Please find a call for input on
> > > RIPE Labs:
> > >
> > > http://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco/future-of-the-ipv6-cpe-survey-more-input-needed
> > >
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Mirjam Kuehne & Marco Hogewoning
> > > RIPE NCC