nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
From: Mikhail Strizhov <strizhov () netsec colostate edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:24:22 -0700
Hi, I didn't use NAT-PT, but have lot of experience with NAT64/DNS64.We've deployed NAT64 with DNS64 in our test lab with last Fedora linux workstations , so far, it works fine.
-- Sincerely, Mikhail Strizhov Email: strizhov () netsec colostate edu <mailto:strizhov () netsec colostate edu> On 01/19/2011 02:18 AM, jarod smith wrote:
Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of linux distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only. For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie. I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like tested their NAT-PT, even if it's obsolete. Are some of you have installed one of these two implementations in production on recent versions of linux? Is it stable, secure, ... ? Regards
Current thread:
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life jarod smith (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life jarod smith (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Cameron Byrne (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Mikhail Strizhov (Jan 19)