nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life
From: jarod smith <jarod.smouth () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:02:33 +0100
Thanks for your reply. In summary it's not possible to deployed IPv6 only if I want to access the whole internet :) On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM, jarod smith <jarod.smouth () gmail com>wrote:
Although it would seem that double-stack is still the preferred method of linux distribution, I want my next deployed in IPv6 only. For linux there is NAT-PT tomicki and NAT64 Viagenie. I don't have Cisco equipment although I'd like tested their NAT-PT, even if it's obsolete. Are some of you have installed one of these two implementations in production on recent versions of linux? Is it stable, secure, ... ? Regards
Current thread:
- NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life jarod smith (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life jarod smith (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Cameron Byrne (Jan 19)
- Re: NAT-PT or NAT64 in real life Mikhail Strizhov (Jan 19)