nanog mailing list archives
RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover
From: "Randy McAnally" <rsm () fast-serv com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:00:28 -0500
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:23:47 -0000, Ahmed Yousuf wrote
- Accept that we are never going to get an ideal distribution of traffic and continue monitoring and adjusting local pref/prepends etc. as and when we need to change the distribution of traffic. Hopefully we don't need to do this that often.
^ This. You're fighting a loosing battle with such slow links. Given the limited route capacity of your router you might as well set up statics aimed at each link and forget about BGP shaping. Just keep a floating default pointed at each peer. -Randy
Current thread:
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover, (continued)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover William Herrin (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Brandon Kim (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover George Bonser (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Carrozzo (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Carrozzo (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Max Pierson (Jan 18)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Ahmed Yousuf (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy McAnally (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Ahmed Yousuf (Jan 19)
- RE: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy McAnally (Jan 19)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Jack Bates (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover William Herrin (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Michel de Nostredame (Jan 18)
- Re: Dual Homed BGP for failover Randy Carpenter (Jan 18)