Re: Post-Exhaustion-phase "punishment" for early adopters

[Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> > No, and in fact, I believe all the RIRs will probably do a reasonably brisk business in reclamation and 
> > reallocation, albeit in ever smaller blocks. 

On Feb 4, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Daniel Seagraves wrote:
> As holder of a small block, this scares and irritates me. It scares me that I might lose my autonomy and future 
> expansion through no fault of my own, and it irritates me that the reason I may be forced to give up my address space 
> will probably be to satisfy the internet's desperate need for more spam cannons.

Excuse me, "reclamation" was probably the wrong word choice on my part.  What I was intending to convey was "processing 
of returned blocks."

And the use for the ever-smaller blocks is not for spammers, but for the IPv4 side of 4-to-6 NATs.

                                -Bill




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1MZSwACgkQGvQy4xTRsBEdqACcDnngVari/dTZrt+ha9P8trct
7J4AoJDftyNiU/lB2+nHZPJrTlIkzJGE
=Aaf9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----