nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:38:49 -0500
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:14:00 EST, david raistrick said:
Er. That's not news. That's been the state of the art for what, 15+ years or so now? SIP (because it's peer to peer) and P2P are really the only things that actually give a damn about it.
"It's client/server unless it's peer-to-peer" is almost a tautology, you know...
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- RE: quietly.... George Bonser (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- RE: quietly.... Lee Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... isabel dias (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 06)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Blake Dunlap (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 04)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Owen DeLong (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Lamar Owen (Feb 10)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Owen DeLong (Feb 10)