nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:39:22 -0600
On 2/1/2011 11:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I prefer persistent GUA over ULA for that.
I do too, though for simple zeroconf devices, I'd prefer ULA over link local. Given that it's not an either or situation, I fully support ULA existing.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Chuck Anderson (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Cameron Byrne (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Bill Stewart (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 01)