nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 12:00:40 -0500 (EST)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch () muada com>
On 3 feb 2011, at 17:16, Jon Lewis wrote:When someone breaks or shuts off that filter, traffic through the NAPT firewall stops working. On the stateful firewall with public IPs on both sides, everything works...including the traffic you didn't want.People are going to want NAT66...and not providing it may slow down IPv6 adoption.Hm, if you turn off the NAT66 function, wouldn't the traffic pass through unhindered, too? Or do you propose to make IPv6 home gateways the same way IPv4 home gateways work, where it's usually not even possible to turn it off?
I think the implication includes available 1918-like space to use behind the NAT which is similarly publicly non-routable; *this* is the part we care about -- that those addresses are only accessible *to the edge router*. Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI, (continued)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jack Bates (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)