nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:21:19 -0600
On 2/1/2011 9:13 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
As v6 innovation continues, v4 will be seen as something obsolete that needs constant work (and v4 innovation will be more and more about patching it to work and keep up with v6).
If it continues. The sad thing is, transition would have been a lot smoother if not for IETF politics. "You can't have these features! It's not IPv4! They would work perfectly fine, but we don't want you to do that!"
I still know a LOT of people who have no desire to switch. They are holding out until vendors implement the features they want. NAPTv6, default router in DHCPv6, etc, etc.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: quietly.... Fred Baker (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Adrian Chadd (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Dave Israel (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Dave Israel (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Paul Graydon (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... bmanning (Feb 01)
- Re: quietly.... Benson Schliesser (Feb 01)