Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6

[Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Feb 28, 2011 12:28 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:
> > It's hard to see v6-only networks as a viable, general-purpose
> > solution to anything in the foreseeable future. I'm not sure why
> > people keep fixating on that as an end goal. The future we ought to be
> > working towards is a consistent, reliable, dual-stack
> > environment. There's no point worrying about v6-only operations if we
> > can't get dual-stack working reliably.
>
> facile but fallacious fanboyism
>
>  o if ipv6 can not operate as the only protocol, and we will be out
>    of ipv4 space and have to deploy 6-only networks, it damned well
>    better be able to stand on its own.
>
>  o if ipv6 can not stand on its own, then dual-stack is a joke that
>    will be very un-funny very shortly, as one partner in the marriage
>    is a dummy.

+1
Well said. V6 needs to stand on its own.

Cb
> randy