nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:08:01 +0100
On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:
Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least mine.
I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change? But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.
Current thread:
- Re: quietly...., (continued)
- Re: quietly.... Florian Weimer (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... David Conrad (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Cameron Byrne (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)
- IPv6 routing talk @ RIPE, was: Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Smith (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 02)
- RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... David Israel (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Michael Dillon (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 18)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 15)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Ricky Beam (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 02)