nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....


From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:08:01 +0100

On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:

Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and
creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice.  It's comments like
this that raise the hair on admins' necks.  At least mine.

I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change?

But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.

Current thread: