Re: quietly....

[David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>]

________________________________

From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>


David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: 
http://www.listentothefranchise.com 

> If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bringing the problems of NAT forward 
> with you, then, I'm fine with you remaining in your >IPv4 island. I'm willing to 
> bet that most organizations will embrace an internet unencumbered by the 
> brokenness that is NAT and >move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has 
> been a significant barrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be.

Lack of NAT may or may not continue to be a barrier to IPv6 adoption.  However, 
it certainly *has* been a barrier to IPv6 adoption - I have had customers tell 
me that explicitly, and I have no reason to doubt them.