nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Test Results
From: C Tate Baumrucker <tate () baumrucker org>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:41:59 -0500
Rolling your own with NDT (web100 tools), placing it on a common transit point within your network, and providing access to your customers will provide decent, consistent and pretty detailed results regarding TCP attributes. There are facilities within the software to perform packet captures for each test too. Works for our help desk to understand relative performance and respond accordingly.
Trust nothing off your managed net. Tate On 12/23/2011 4:18 AM, jacob miller wrote:
Hi, Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites. Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to this. Regards, Jacob
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Current thread:
- Speed Test Results jacob miller (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Bret Clark (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Maimon (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Paul Stewart (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- RE: Speed Test Results Brandon Kim (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Cutler James R (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results C Tate Baumrucker (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Octavio Alvarez (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Alex Brooks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Livingood, Jason (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 28)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel Maslak (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joel jaeggli (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Michael Holstein (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Joe Hamelin (Dec 23)
- Re: Speed Test Results Graham Beneke (Dec 23)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Speed Test Results Leigh Porter (Dec 23)