nanog mailing list archives
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 21:27:03 +0000
In article <4EE6E7D2.8060306 () bogus com>, Joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com> writes
So now we will reap the consequences and it will be at the cost of new market entrants (which I am sure will please some people) and perhaps cold hard cash for those who cannot expand their business or have to 'buy' address space.New market entrants are the customers of existing operators, so their plight and the feasibility of being a new market entrant impacts our bottom lines.
On the three occasions where I've been involved in running a new market entrant they were not previously a customer of an existing operator (other than the founders having an earlier personal online account with someone or other).
So it's not always a case of an entrant getting started using someone else's IP transit (and IP addressing), then bringing that in-house.
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Sad IPv4 story?, (continued)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Barry Shein (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Philip Dorr (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jimmy Hess (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Eric Parsonage (Dec 11)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 12)
- RE: Sad IPv4 story? Leigh Porter (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Roland Perry (Dec 17)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 12)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Randy Bush (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Joel jaeggli (Dec 10)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Jared Mauch (Dec 13)
- Re: Sad IPv4 story? Mark Tinka (Dec 14)