nanog mailing list archives
Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering
From: Jen Linkova <furry13 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:06:58 +1100
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de> wrote:
Any switch on the path?It is an L2 circuit that rides a couple of different pieces of gear before it lands at the other side.Sounds like this equipment having problems with IPv6 multicast...
Yep, that's why I was asking - but it doesn't explain how/why ND for GUA works in this case. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
Current thread:
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering, (continued)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Owen DeLong (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Leo Bicknell (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Peter Rubenstein (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Justin M. Streiner (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jack Bates (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Vicky Shrestha (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jen Linkova (Dec 08)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Daniel Roesen (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Jen Linkova (Dec 09)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Randy Carpenter (Dec 07)
- Re: Juniper <-> Cisco IPv6 BGP peering Mark Tinka (Dec 09)