nanog mailing list archives
Re: OSPF vs IS-IS
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:19:44 +0900
The only reason in my opinion to run IS-IS rather than OSPF today is due to the fact that IS-IS is decoupled from IP making it less vulnerable to attacks.
how about simpler and more stable? randy
Current thread:
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS, (continued)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Randy Bush (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeffrey S. Young (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Saku Ytti (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Scott Morris (Aug 12)
- RE: OSPF vs IS-IS Doug Marschke (Aug 16)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jeff Wheeler (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Douglas Otis (Aug 12)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Jimmy Hess (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Stefan Fouant (Aug 11)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Vinny Abello (Aug 13)
- Re: OSPF vs IS-IS Matt Addison (Aug 13)