nanog mailing list archives
Re: Youtube Geolocation
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:12:35 -0400
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Harry Strongburg <harry.nanog () harry lu> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 09:55:03PM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:how has mtu got anything to do with packet path?PMTUD?
that won't change the destination based routed path, it'll cause the endpoints to lower their MTU to a mutually agreeable threshold. The packets will still flow along the same path. (besides pmtud brings the mtu down, not up... the proposal was to raise the mtu) -chris
Current thread:
- Youtube Geolocation Dan White (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Carl Rosevear (Apr 21)
- RE: Youtube Geolocation Mike Schoenfeld (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Carl Rosevear (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Dan White (Apr 21)
- RE: Youtube Geolocation Mike Schoenfeld (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Carl Rosevear (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Harry Strongburg (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Harry Strongburg (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Christopher Morrow (Apr 21)
- Re: Youtube Geolocation Blake Hudson (Apr 22)