nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 Avian Carriers?
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:56:47 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the contrary.Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us a new brown M&M to put into the contracts...
I wonder what NYC paramedic David Roth would think, to find out that he'd coined a bit of technical jargon, quite by accident. Cheers, -- jra
Current thread:
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers?, (continued)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Chad Dailey (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Steven Bellovin (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Robert Bonomi (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Morris (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Scott Brim (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Leo Bicknell (Apr 07)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Jay Ashworth (Apr 07)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Justin M. Streiner (Apr 01)
- Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Dorn Hetzel (Apr 01)
- Re: v6 Avian Carriers? Cutler James R (Apr 01)