Re: Re: v6 Avian Carriers?

[Dorn Hetzel <dorn () hetzel org>]

I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence
number field to keep them separate ?

On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner
<streiner () cluebyfour org>wrote:

> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
>
>  I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional
> > DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say
> > 155.229.10.20:1024-2047.  Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the
> > carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP.   :)
>
> Would the end-user get both the TCP and UDP ports from their assigned
> range?  Also, how would you handle ICMP/ESP/etc... or would those be 'free
> with the purchase of..."?
>
> jms