nanog mailing list archives
Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic?
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:10:11 -0700
George Bonser wrote:
I believe a network should be able to sell priotitization at the edge, but not in the core. I have no problem with Y!, for example, paying a network to be prioritized ahead of bit torrent on the segment to the end
Considering yahoo (as any other big freemailer) is (unwillingly for the most part) facilitating a lot of spam traffic this would mean a lot of spam traffic gets prioritised. I can see that as an undesirable and unfortunate side effect.
Regards, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
Current thread:
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid,, (continued)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Joe Greco (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Jack Bates (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Joe Greco (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Leo Bicknell (Sep 17)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- RE: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Brian Johnson (Sep 16)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Prioritized Traffic? Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: Did Internet Founders Actually Anticipate Paid, Joe Greco (Sep 17)