nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISP port blocking practice


From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 18:38:50 -0700

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Franck Martin <franck () genius com> wrote:

In many countries, the presence of bots consume a non-trivial amount of
bandwidth. In developing countries, this is a non trivial amount of $$$
(http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/09/05/1620212/UN-Tech-Group-Finds-Mo
st-Expensive-Broadband)

Blocking port 25 allows to help identify which hosts are consuming
bandwidth (likely to have a bot). Identifying and removing these hosts
from the network is crucial and economically viable, unfortunately these
are skills sometimes not available in such countries.

Just saying...


It looks like Germany is now all aboard a program regarding this:

http://www.cio.com.au/article/359491/germany_launch_antibotnet_program_cons
umers/

FYI,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFMhEYkq1pz9mNUZTMRAkA0AJ44e0uMzlR4iXwpZAE8RQSUM3NmegCg4kV1
WOyT+X0/daNa92gGYG53Rtg=
=yMOX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: