nanog mailing list archives

Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption


From: Leslie Nobile <leslien () arin net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:59:24 -0400

Quick FYI - ARIN has a documented appeals process that an organization can
use if they believe that ARIN staff did not follow community-established
policies in the review of their resource request.  Here is the link:

https://www.arin.net/resources/resource_requests/appeal_process.html

Regards,
Leslie


Leslie Nobile
Director, Registration Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers


On 10/19/10 2:21 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:


On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

On 10/19/2010 4:29 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:

No... ARIN hands out a MINIMUM /32. A medium sized ISP should be asking for
larger.


ME: I really need larger space
ARIN: We don't see how you can justify it, and we hardly ever give larger
than /32

Did you send them a customer count exceeding about 25,000 customers and point
out that
you were giving /48s to each of them? If you did, they would not have had a
leg to stand on.

However, there has been a bit of a learning curve with ARIN staff and IPv6,
so, there have
been some errant denials. I'm working on policy to further expand their
ability to approve
larger allocations. Expect to see it posted in the next week or so.

THE END

or, if you have larger POPs, start with a /24 and
/32 regional assignment supporting 256 regional assignments
/36 for 16 pops per region
/48 for 4,096 customer end-sites per POP

Ideal solution, but don't see it happening

Why not?

ARIN thinks a /32 is the MINIMUM for an ISP. Not the Maximum. Several ISPs
have received larger than /32 and all you need to do is show a reasonable
justification for the space.

See above. You think I asked for a /32? While I'd probably desire a /24 for
ease of routing and management, I'd only asked for a /31 and was turned down
with the "Very few will get more than a /32."

When did you ask? If it was more than 6 months ago, then, I would suggest
asking again. If it was less than 6
months ago, can you send me any or all of the correspondence so I can address
it with Leslie and try and
get whatever training issues remain resolved?

Hey, perhaps I'm wrong. Perhaps I asked too early, even though I purposefully
delayed asking.

If ARIN is incorrectly denying requests, I'll definitely work on getting that
resolved.

and from your other reply:

Yep... Best not to argue with Jack... A much better strategy, IMHO, is to
better serve his former customers.

Good luck on that. My customers like my service and the lengths we go for
them. Obviously, there are always those who are discontent, but we listen to
what they want and need, and we make it happen. Feel free to come to rural
Oklahoma and compete. The prefix rotation argument has been covered before,
which is why I'd rather keep it to the original argument and probably
shouldn't have mentioned it since it always creates a side topic.

The beauty is that we don't have to come to rural OK to compete. We can just
let them use whatever stingy amount
of address space you provide to get a tunnel to us.

Owen





Current thread: