nanog mailing list archives

Re: network name 101100010100110.net

From: Day Domes <daydomes () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:02:30 -0400

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com> wrote:

On Saturday night, Day Domes <daydomes () gmail com> postulated:

I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
any issues with this?



It's truly unsigned?
(15 bit)

--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474


unsigned?

Current thread:

network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
  - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
  - Message not available
    - Message not available
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Day Domes (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net Per Carlson (Oct 16)
  - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Matthew Palmer (Oct 16)
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 16)
- Re: network name 101100010100110.net James Hess (Oct 17)
  - Re: network name 101100010100110.net bmanning (Oct 17)
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Mark Andrews (Oct 17)
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joe Hamelin (Oct 17)
    - Re: network name 101100010100110.net Joel Jaeggli (Oct 17)

(Thread continues...)